EMS World Magazine is the most authoritative source in the world for clinical and educational material designed to improve the delivery of prehospital emergency medical care.
Issue link: https://emsworld.epubxp.com/i/110985
BEHIND THE MYTHS | By William E. "Gene" Gandy, JD, LP, and Steven "Kelly" Grayson, NREMT-P, CCEMT-P Abdominal Pain Relief Analgesia wonÕt interfere with docsÕ diagnoses WHAT HAPPENS WHEN we subject dogma to scientifc scrutiny? Kelly Grayson and Gene Gandy will answer that question in this new series, as each month they challenge some of EMS' most closely held beliefs and practices to meet the standards of evidence-based medicine. It's time to drag a few sacred cows to the slaughterhouse! At 74 Nora looked 20 years younger. She was in excellent health and great physical shape, riding her bicycle daily and playing golf twice a week. She felt wonderful. That is, until one Saturday night after dinner, when she developed a dull pain in the pit of her stomach. This, she thought, is not right. Soon she felt nauseated and vomited. After that she felt better but tired and just not up to par, so she went to bed early and had no trouble falling asleep. But at 0500 a nagging pain in her lower right abdomen woke her up. It was dull at first, but by 0600 it had become sharp and, when she moved, caused her to almost cry out. Sally, and doing an appropriate physical exam, they agreed it was very likely Nora had appendicitis. She had classic signs and symptoms, and her history fit the picture perfectly. They lifted her gently onto the stretcher and started for the ambulance. When the stretcher wheels bounced over the threshold of the front door, Nora cried out in pain. Once in the ambulance she got into the fetal position, which seemed to help, but was still hurting terribly. As Jared began the drive to the hospital 36 miles away, Nora asked Susan if there was anything she could give her for pain. Susan replied, "Unfortunately not. Since you have abdominal pain, we are prohibited from giving you pain relief until after the surgeon sees you in the hospital." Later Nora described it as the most horrible ride of her life. She had never experienced such agony before, and the agony continued long after she arrived at the hospital. The only available surgeon was in the OR fixing the liver and kidney of a motorcycle collision victim and could "Patients may never forget being made to suffer because of a flawed system." Her first thought was to call her doctor, but it was Sunday morning. She decided to take some Pepto-Bismol and see if it would go away. But just walking to the bathroom caused her great pain, so she retreated to bed and called her friend, Sally, next door. Sally, a retired nurse, said she would be right over. Arriving 10 minutes later, Sally immediately decided Nora needed to go to the hospital. "Do you still have your appendix?" she asked. Nora said she did. "Well, darling, I think you may have appendicitis. Let's call 9-1-1." Medics Susan and Jared got the call and responded in less than 10 minutes. After hearing the history from Nora and 24 MARCH 2013 | EMSWORLD.com not get to her for more than three hours. She writhed in pain the whole time. Why, you ask, is it necessary to keep patients with abdominal pain in agony while they wait for surgical evaluation? The answer: It's not, but in many places it is still the practice. The History The prohibition against analgesia for patients with undifferentiated abdominal pain goes back almost 100 years, if not longer. In 1921 Sir Zachary Cope published Cope's Early Diagnosis of the Acute Abdomen, possibly the most famous and infuential surgical text of all time. In it he recommended pain medications not be given to patients with undiagnosed abdominal pain until a surgeon had evaluated them. This tenet has been adhered to religiously by physicians and surgeons for many decades. But times have changed. In 1921 CT scanners, bedside ultrasound and MRI machines did not exist. Surgeons used their knowledge of anatomy, their hands and elegantly refned assessment techniques to arrive at a diagnosis. Naloxone (Narcan) was not developed until the 1960s, and there was no way to reverse an opioid overdose effectively in 1921. Doses were usually not titrated to pain relief, and dosing to the point of sedation could occur. In 1921 IM injections of 30 mg of morphine were common. Today, however, although physical assessment skills are still very important, modern radiographic studies make diagnosis much easier, and opioid effects can be reversed readily if desirable. Few surgeons, if any, will bring a patient to the operating room based upon physical diagnosis alone, making potential masking of symptoms by opioid administration a moot point. For the last 30 years, editions of Early Diagnosis have been edited by William Silen, MD, of Harvard University. In the latest edition, the 21st, he wrote: The patient cries out for relief, the relatives are insistent that something shall be done, and the humane disciple of Aesculapius is driven to diminish or banish the too-obvious agony by administering a narcotic. The realization, likely erroneous, that narcotics can obscure the clinical picture has given rise to the unfortunate dictum that these drugs should never be given until a diagnosis has been firmly established. With the numerous layers of triage nurses, medical students, residents and attending physicians in modern emergency units, and with the addition of time-consuming